Skip to main content

Honda Accord Reliability Report

Reviewed by the MotorRank Media editorial team · Last reviewed May 2026 · Our methodology

91/100
Low RiskRank #3

Photo: MercurySable99 · CC BY-SA 4.0

Reliability Snapshot

The Honda Accord is one of the most reliable midsize cars on the road, earning a 4.5/5.0 from RepairPal and ranking 1st out of 24 midsize cars, with low repair frequency (about 0.26 shop visits per year) and only a 9% chance any given repair is a major one. The big caveats are concentrated in two eras: early-2000s V6 automatics (2003-2007) had genuinely failure-prone transmissions, and the 2008-2010 generation is notorious for fast-wearing rear brakes (the subject of a class-action settlement). A well-maintained 2013-or-newer four-cylinder routinely reaches 200,000-plus miles with modest, predictable upkeep.

Back to reliability hub

Reliability by the numbers

RepairPal Reliability Rating
4.5 out of 5.0
RepairPal rank among midsize cars
1st out of 24
RepairPal average annual repair cost
$400
J.D. Power 2025 Quality & Reliability score
80 out of 100
J.D. Power 2025 overall consumer rating (prior-year data, redesign)
82 out of 100
iSeeCars chance of reaching 250,000+ miles (2025 Longest-Lasting Cars study)
8.8% (3.4x the 2.6% car average; ranks 9th among longest-lasting passenger cars)
J.D. Power Quality & Reliability — 2018 Accord (10th generation launch year)
76 out of 100
J.D. Power Quality & Reliability — 2023 Accord (11th generation launch year; prior-year data applied to redesign)
80 out of 100
J.D. Power Quality & Reliability — 2025 Accord (prior-year data applied to redesign)
80 out of 100

Common Honda Accord Problems

  • Automatic transmission failure / slipping and jerking (V6 5-speed autos, 7th-gen era, ~2003-2007). Symptoms include a flashing 'D4' light, hard or erratic shifts, and outright failure; this is the Accord's single worst documented category and the reason CarComplaints rates the 2003 as the worst model year overall.

    High

    Typical onset: 95k-110k mi · Repair cost: $2,400-$2,900 (rebuild/replace, per CarComplaints averages)

  • Premature rear brake pad wear, plus warped front rotors (8th-gen, ~2008-2010). Owners reported rear pads wearing out in roughly 15,000-20,000 miles; this was the subject of a Honda class-action settlement that gave preliminary approval in 2010 covering 2008-2010 Accords (and 2009-2010 Acura TSX).

    Medium

    Typical onset: 15k-20k mi (recurring) · Repair cost: $230-$500 per axle service

  • Warped front brake rotors causing steering-wheel/pedal vibration when braking (broad span of model years; 562 RepairPal reports, the single most-reported Accord problem).

    Low

    Typical onset: 40k-80k mi · Repair cost: $300-$600

  • 1.5L turbo (1.5T) engine oil dilution / fuel mixing with oil on 2018+ Accords driven mostly short trips in cold climates; owners report the oil level rising above the dipstick FULL mark and a fuel smell. Honda issued software updates and, in some cases, replaced fuel injectors. A maintenance nuisance for most, but neglected severe cases have been reported to cause engine damage.

    Low

    Typical onset: 10k-40k mi · Repair cost: $0-$300 (software update / injector replacement / more frequent oil changes)

  • Ignition switch failure causing intermittent no-start (older generations). One of the most-reported issues across the Honda lineup, with the Accord a leading contributor (Honda-wide 'no start due to ignition switch failure' totals 900+ reports on RepairPal).

    Medium

    Typical onset: 70k-120k mi · Repair cost: $190-$270

Best & Worst Model Years

Best years
2013-2017 (9th gen) and 2018-2022 (10th gen), favoring the naturally-aspirated 2.4L / 2.0L four-cylinder trims
Years to approach with caution
2003-2007 (V6 automatic transmission failures) and 2008 (worst overall for premature brake wear and highest complaint volume)

CarComplaints rates the 2003 Accord as the worst model year overall, driven by transmission failures (avg ~$2,700 to fix around 98,000 miles), while the 2008 has the highest raw complaint volume (about 2,500 complaints), dominated by premature brake wear. Reliability improves sharply from the 9th generation (2013+) onward; the 2013-2017 2.4L four-cylinder and the 2018+ 2.0T are widely regarded as the most trouble-free choices. Among newer cars, the 1.5T's cold-weather oil-dilution reports are the main thing to verify on a test drive and service history.

Honda Accord Reliability by Generation

1st generation

Not rated (pre-modern data)

Classic compact; mechanically simple carbureted engines. Predates J.D. Power and NHTSA electronic complaint datasets, so no meaningful modern reliability score. Body rust is the main survivor concern. CarBuzz omits this gen as data-sparse. Year span 1976-1981 matches Honda's official Accord timeline and CarBuzz (Wikipedia lists US MY1977-1982 as an edge convention).

2nd generation

Not rated (pre-modern data)

Introduced fuel injection on some trims. Like the 1st gen, too old for J.D. Power/NHTSA scoring. Omitted by CarBuzz for the same reason. Reliability is essentially condition- and maintenance-dependent at this age. Year span verified against Honda official timeline.

3rd generation

Strong (era-relative)

CarBuzz ranks this the MOST reliable Accord generation (verified via live fetch). Known weak point: automatic transmissions can wear around 120,000-140,000 miles. Otherwise simple and durable. No major modern recall exposure of note. Year span verified against Honda official timeline.

4th generation

Strong (era-relative)

CarBuzz ranks 2nd most reliable (verified). Renowned for longevity — owner reports of 250k+ miles. Main concerns are age-related (timing belt service, distributor failures). Minimal recall footprint. Year span verified against Honda official timeline.

5th generation

Above average (era-relative)

CarBuzz ranks 6th of 8 (verified). Year span 1994-1997 confirmed against Honda's own official timeline (hondanews.com) and CarBuzz; Wikipedia's '1994-1998' reflects a coupe/wagon overlap edge case. Generally durable; common issues include automatic transmission wear and ignition/distributor failures. No large modern recall campaigns specific to this gen.

6th generation

Below average

CarBuzz ranks 7th of 8 (verified). Year span confirmed against Honda official timeline. Transmission failure is the signature problem: ~574 complaints across the gen, with the 2002 model drawing 993 complaints (794 transmission-related). Despite this, well-maintained examples have reached 300k+ miles per owner reports.

7th generation

J.D. Power 2007: 88/100 (consumer rating)

CarBuzz ranks this the LEAST reliable generation overall (verified), driven by the 2003 model year: 1,700+ CarComplaints and 2,000+ NHTSA complaints, plus automatic transmission failures. Launched in 2002 for MY2003 (Wikipedia-confirmed). Heavy recall exposure: Takata airbags (15V320000 / 19V501000, both NHTSA-verified), 2003 ignition interlock (10V364000, 551,498 units, verified), and 2003 wiper motor (08V169000, 351,000 units, verified). Note the high J.D. Power consumer score reflects owner satisfaction, not the complaint/recall record — buy later years (2006-2007) over 2003.

8th generation

J.D. Power final two years ~82/100

CarBuzz ranks 5th of 8 (verified). The 2008 model has the most overall complaints of any Accord and logged 2,494 complaints in its first year. Signature issue: excessive oil consumption on the 4-cylinder (~390+ CarComplaints reports — 395 as of the latest check — at a $1,260 average repair, both verified on CarComplaints). Also caught by the 2005-2010 transmission recall (11V395000, 1,512,107 units, NHTSA-verified) and Takata airbags. Later years (2011-2012) are the safer buy.

9th generation

Solid (J.D. Power ~84/100 for 2016)

CarBuzz ranks 3rd most reliable — the best modern pick (verified). CarBuzz calls the 2016 the best bet (84/100). Watch items: 2013-2015 CVT 4-cyl driveshaft recall (20V769000, 235,034 units, salt-belt states, NHTSA-verified), 2013-2016 battery-sensor fire recall (17V418000, 1,148,550 units, NHTSA-verified), and the broad 2013-2023 fuel pump recall (23V858000, NHTSA-verified). Early 2013 CVT and infotainment complaints make later years (2015-2017) preferable.

10th generation

J.D. Power 2018: 82/100 overall (Quality & Reliability sub-score ~76/100); final year ~83/100

CarBuzz ranks 4th (verified). 2018 J.D. Power overall 82/100 confirmed on jdpower.com. Turbo 1.5L and 2.0L engines; some 1.5T owners reported fuel dilution/oil-level concerns early in the run. Recall exposure: 2018-2019 fuel pump (20V314000, 135,995 units, later expanded by 23V858000; NHTSA-verified), 2018-2020 BCM software (20V771000, 737,233 units, NHTSA-verified), and 2018-2019 seat-belt buckle (23V158000, 448,613 units, NHTSA-verified). Later years (2020-2022) are the most refined.

11th generation

Too new for full reliability dataset

Redesigned for 2023 on an upgraded platform; hybrid is standard on upper trims (204 hp two-motor system), turbo 1.5L on LX/EX. CarBuzz omits it as too new to rank (verified). Covered by the 2013-2023 fuel pump recall (23V858000) for affected build dates. Long-term reliability data is still accumulating.

Major Honda Accord Recalls

  • Fuel pump impeller may deform and render the fuel pump inoperative, causing engine no-star

    2,484,588

    Fuel pump impeller may deform and render the fuel pump inoperative, causing engine no-start or stall while driving (2018-2020 Accord and 2017-2020 Accord Hybrid among 23 affected models; expansion of 20V-314/21V-215).

    NHTSA 23V858000

  • Front passenger seat weight sensor circuit board capacitor can crack and short, causing im

    750,114

    Front passenger seat weight sensor circuit board capacitor can crack and short, causing improper passenger airbag deployment (2020-2022 Accord and 2020-2021 Accord Hybrid among affected models).

    NHTSA 24V064000

  • High-pressure fuel pump can crack and leak fuel, increasing fire risk

    720,810

    High-pressure fuel pump can crack and leak fuel, increasing fire risk (2023-2024 Accord and Accord Hybrid among affected models).

    NHTSA 24V763000

  • Low-density fuel pump impeller can deform and cause engine no-start or stall while driving

    624,552

    Low-density fuel pump impeller can deform and cause engine no-start or stall while driving (2019-2020 Accord and 2019 Accord Hybrid among affected models; expansion of 20V-314).

    NHTSA 21V215000

  • Front seat belt pretensioners assembled without the rivet securing the quick connector and

    303,770

    Front seat belt pretensioners assembled without the rivet securing the quick connector and wire plate, so they may not properly restrain occupants (2023-2024 Accord and HR-V).

    NHTSA 23V782000

  • Fuel pump module with low-density impeller can fail, causing engine no-start or stall

    136,057

    Fuel pump module with low-density impeller can fail, causing engine no-start or stall (2018 Accord 10,152 units and 2019 Accord 1,075 units among affected models).

    NHTSA 20V314000

Recall data from NHTSA. Always check a specific VIN at nhtsa.gov/recalls.

Before You Buy

Avoid 2003-2007 V6 automatics unless the transmission has documented service/replacement; budget for frequent rear brake jobs on 2008-2010 cars; on any 1.5T verify oil level and oil-change history. The four-cylinder Accord is the safer long-term bet across every generation.

What owners report

Owner communities widely regard the Accord as one of the most durable midsize sedans, with many reporting 150k-300k miles on mostly routine maintenance and few major failures. The most recurring gripe centers on the 10th-gen (2018+) 1.5T turbo engine's oil/fuel dilution in cold climates and on short trips, plus scattered concerns about CVT longevity and infotainment quirks; owners generally consider the naturally-aspirated/hybrid and post-2020 turbo models the most trouble-free.

Honda Accord Reliability FAQ

Is the Honda Accord reliable?
The Honda Accord is one of the most reliable midsize cars on the road, earning a 4.5/5.0 from RepairPal and ranking 1st out of 24 midsize cars, with low repair frequency (about 0.26 shop visits per year) and only a 9% chance any given repair is a major one. The big caveats are concentrated in two eras: early-2000s V6 automatics (2003-2007) had genuinely failure-prone transmissions, and the 2008-2010 generation is notorious for fast-wearing rear brakes (the subject of a class-action settlement). A well-maintained 2013-or-newer four-cylinder routinely reaches 200,000-plus miles with modest, predictable upkeep.
What are the most reliable Honda Accord model years?
2013-2017 (9th gen) and 2018-2022 (10th gen), favoring the naturally-aspirated 2.4L / 2.0L four-cylinder trims. CarComplaints rates the 2003 Accord as the worst model year overall, driven by transmission failures (avg ~$2,700 to fix around 98,000 miles), while the 2008 has the highest raw complaint volume (about 2,500 complaints), dominated by premature brake wear. Reliability improves sharply from the 9th generation (2013+) onward; the 2013-2017 2.4L four-cylinder and the 2018+ 2.0T are widely regarded as the most trouble-free choices. Among newer cars, the 1.5T's cold-weather oil-dilution reports are the main thing to verify on a test drive and service history.
Which Honda Accord years should you avoid?
We'd approach these model years with extra caution: 2003-2007 (V6 automatic transmission failures) and 2008 (worst overall for premature brake wear and highest complaint volume).
How much does it cost to maintain a Honda Accord?
~$400/yr (RepairPal) — vs. $526 average for midsize cars and $652 across all vehicles. Ownership costs are excellent: RepairPal pegs the Accord at $400/year in unscheduled repairs, about 24% below the midsize-car average, with owners visiting the shop only about 0.26 times a year and just a 9% chance a repair is severe. Four-cylinder models are cheaper to maintain than V6s, and timing-chain (not belt) engines on modern Accords remove a major scheduled expense. Budgeting for brakes and routine fluids covers most years.
What are the most common Honda Accord problems?
The most frequently reported issues are: Automatic transmission failure / slipping and jerking; Premature rear brake pad wear, plus warped front rotors; Warped front brake rotors causing steering-wheel/pedal vibration when braking.